Sieben Anzeichen dafür, dass Ihr Cybersecurity-Framework überarbeitet werden muss
Tuesday, December 30, 2025
What
The article details that many organizations neglect their cybersecurity frameworks, which are crucial guidelines for protection against cyberattacks. It identifies five key warning signs that an existing framework is outdated and requires an overhaul: lack of recent review or dynamic updates, failure to integrate AI into strategy, experiencing any cyberattack, difficulty with continuous monitoring, infrequent formal reviews (e.g., only every few years), and being constantly reactive to alerts instead of proactive planning. Experts recommend implementing dynamic processes, aligning with established standards like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement to enhance cyber resilience.
Where
The article discusses general corporate cybersecurity practices, applicable to companies and organizations globally, without specifying particular regions or industries beyond general business contexts.
When
The article focuses on ongoing best practices and the need for continuous review, rather than a specific event. It suggests frameworks should be reviewed at least every two months, with full reviews every two years, and highlights that a lack of significant changes in three years or more indicates an outdated framework.
Key Factors
- •Keri Pearlson from MIT Sloan emphasizes that the biggest mistake is not recognizing an outdated plan, advocating for a dynamic process that detects environmental changes and initiates adaptation, combining technology and human assessment.
- •Steven Bucher, CSO at Mastercard, highlights that even a small security incident can expose weaknesses like outdated protocols or gaps in employee training, underscoring the need for proactive reviews and a culture of cybersecurity awareness.
- •Dave Floyd from Hughes Network Systems recommends aligning frameworks with established standards like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and integrating industry-specific compliance requirements, while also stressing the importance of integrating AI into cybersecurity strategy.
- •Sandra McLeod, CISO at Zoom, advises a full framework review every two years, supplemented by brief interim checks, to keep pace with the rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, especially with the rise of generative AI.
Takeaways
- →Organizations must treat cybersecurity frameworks as dynamic entities requiring continuous review and updates, not static documents, to effectively counter evolving threats.
- →Proactive measures, including regular framework assessments and the integration of emerging technologies like AI, are crucial for maintaining cyber resilience and preventing incidents.
- →Implement a dynamic process for detecting changes, align frameworks with established standards like NIST, and foster a culture of cybersecurity awareness to ensure continuous improvement and robust protection.
Opens original article on CSO Online
